LATEDIA WASHINGTON v DIALOG DIRECT, INC.

Case No. 2:21-cv-10445-LVP-RSW in The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is this lawsuit about?

    1. This lawsuit is pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Latedia Washington (the “Plaintiff”), sued DialogDirect, Inc. in this class action case (Washington v. DialogDirect, Inc., 2:21-CV-10445) alleging that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. §1681b(b)(3), because it failed to provide applicants subjected to an adverse employment action, based in whole or in part on their consumer report, notice and a copy of the report before taking such action. DialogDirect contends that its procedures did not violate the FCRA and did not willfully violate the FCRA. DialogDirect maintains that, absent a settlement, it would have vigorously defended the case on the merits and for class certification purposes, and is settling because of the expense of litigation, the length of time necessary to resolve the issues presented, and the inconvenience involved.
      This “Adverse Action Class” is defined to include:

      All U.S. Resident individuals on whom Defendant obtained a consumer report for employment purposes between February 26, 2019, and July 1, 2021 and Defendant’s records reflect that such report contained an item of information coded as potentially disqualifying for employment with Defendant.

       

  2. Who are the Attorneys representing the Class and how will they be paid?

    1. The Court has appointed lawyers to represent the Class, but you may enter an appearance in the case through an attorney if you want. If you do so, you will have to pay for your own lawyer.
      The attorneys who have been appointed by the Court to represent the Class are:

      Marc R. Edelman Morgan & Morgan, P.A.
      201 N. Franklin Street, 7th Floor Tampa, FL 33602-5157
      813-223-5505

      Defendant has agreed to establish a Settlement Fund up to a maximum amount of $487,500.00 to settle this lawsuit. Subject to the Court’s approval, DialogDirect, Inc. has agreed to compensate Class Counsel for its attorney’s fees an amount equal to one-third of the Settlement Fund ($162,337.50). Class Counsel will also ask the Court to approve a $5,000.00 payment to Plaintiff for her service to the class and as compensation for releasing all claims against DialogDirect, Inc.

  3. What rights am I giving up in this Settlement?

    1. Unless you exclude yourself from this Settlement, you will be considered a member of the Class, which means you give up your right to sue or file a lawsuit against DialogDirect, Inc. or its related entities regarding the legal issues that were raised or could have been raised in this case. Giving up your legal claims is called a release. The released parties collectively include DialogDirect, Inc. and its parent and related companies, direct or indirect affiliates, principals and agents. You will be releasing these parties from all claims relating to the procurement of a background check when you applied for a job.

  4. If I chose to do so, how do I exclude myself from the Settlement?

    1. If you wish to be excluded, you must mail a written request for exclusion to the Settlement Administrator at:

      Washington v DialogDirect Settlement Administrator, PO Box 23459, Jacksonville, FL 32241

      Your request for exclusion must be in writing and postmarked on or before March 21, 2022. The request must state: “I do not want to be part of the Class in Washington v. DialogDirect, Inc., 2:21-CV-10445. The request should be signed, with your name, address, and telephone number printed below your signature. The address you use should be the address to which this notice was mailed, so that you can be properly identified. However, if you have a new address, please inform us of the new address so we can make the change in the Class List.

  5. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement?

    1. The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing on April 6, 2022, at 10 a.m. The hearing will be held in the United States Federal Courthouse for the Eastern District of Michigan, 231 W Lafayette Blvd, Detroit, MI 48226. At the Fairness Hearing, the Court will consider whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court will hear objections to the settlement, if any. We do not know how long the Court will take to make its decision. In addition, the hearing may be continued at any time by the Court without further notice to you.

  6. Where can I get additional information?

    1. This notice is only a summary of the proposed Settlement of this lawsuit. Certain pleadings and documents filed in Court, including the Settlement Agreement, may be reviewed or copied in the Clerk’s Office or by visiting the Important Court Documents section. You may also contact the Settlement Administrator by calling 800-566-0684 or emailing [email protected]

  7. How do I object to the Settlement?

    1. Any member of the Settlement Class who wishes to object to the settlement must return by U.S. mail to the Settlement Administrator a timely written statement of objection no later than March 21, 2022.
      Administrator mails the Notice of Settlement. Any member of the Settlement Class who submits a timely request for exclusion or opt out may not file an objection to the settlement and shall be deemed to have waived any rights or benefits under this Stipulation of Settlement. The Notice of Objection must state:

      (1) the case name and number;
      (2) the name, address, telephone number, and email address (if any) of the member of the Settlement Class making the objection;
      (3) a statement of the objection(s) being asserted;
      (4) a detailed description of the facts and any legal authorities underlying each objection;
      (5) a notice of intent to appear at the final Fairness Hearing, if the Settlement Class Member making the objection intends to appear;
      (6) a list of any witnesses the Settlement Class Member making the objection may call to testify at the Final Approval Hearing, whether in person, by deposition, or affidavit; and
      (7) a list of any exhibits, and copies of the same, which that such objector may offer at the Final Approval Hearing. Any objection must be personally signed by the objector.

      No member of the Settlement Class shall be entitled to contest in any way the approval of the terms and conditions of this Stipulation of Settlement or the Case 2:21-cv-10445-LVP-RSW ECF No. 13-1, PageID.126 Filed 11/22/21 Page 25 of 42 25 Court’s Final Approval Order except by filing and serving written objections in accordance with the provisions of this Stipulation of Settlement. Any member of the Settlement Class who fails to make objections in the manner specified above shall be deemed to have waived any objections and shall be foreclosed from making any objections, whether by appeal or otherwise, to the settlement. The Settlement Administrator shall provide any objections and backup information to Defendant’s Counsel and Class Counsel, who shall file same with the Court at least seven (7) days before the Final Approval Hearing or as otherwise ordered by the Court.